Picture
 

Cung Le, Jon Fitch and Nate Quarry Spearhead Class Action Lawsuit Against UFC

Written by Tom Ngo
December 16th, 2014
Share on Facebook0Google+0Tweet about this on Twitter

UFC Cung Le

Cung Le (pictured), Jon Fitch and Nate Quarry filed a multi-million-dollar class-action lawsuit Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in San Jose against the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC).

The trio are accusing the planet’s premier mixed martial arts promotion of illegally maintaining a monopoly by systematically eliminating competition via buyouts, artificially suppressing fighters’ earnings from bouts and merchandising and marketing activities through restrictive contracting and other exclusionary practices.

Le, Quarry and former UFC welterweight champion Carlos Newton, who Quarry said was one of the driving forces behind this movement, sat side-by-side at Hyatt Place in San Jose with their respective attorneys explaining their motives behind the lawsuit.

“This lawsuit is about fairness. It’s about a fair market value for the athletes,” Quarry stated. “It’s time for those things to change.”

Quarry competed on the first season of “the Ultimate Fighter” and fought for the UFC 10 times before retiring in 2010. Le is still under contract with the UFC. However, the 42-year-old recently requested his release after the company botched his drug test results and offered up no apology.

“It has a been a tough road,” Le expressed. “I’m just honored to be a part of this lawsuit against the UFC for the past fighters and for all the future fighters. I’m just very excited to get this going.”

Fitch was not present at today’s press conference. He is recovering from a vicious submission loss this past Saturday in a World Series of Fighting bout. However, one of the incidents that involved the former UFC welterweight top contender was brought up during the presser.

Zuffa requires its athletes, for no compensation, to assign exclusively and in perpetuity their likeness rights for video game use. Fitch was briefly fired by UFC president Dana White in 2008 after initially refusing to sign away his likeness for “UFC Undisputed.” He was brought back by UFC co-owner Lorenzo Fertitta the following day and ultimately caved to the UFC’s demands.

Fitch was released once again last year after losing two of three fights.

Rob Maysey, the lead attorney who worked relentlessly to get the ball rolling on this lawsuit and has petitioned for years for an MMA fighters union, was very emotional when discussing the case. Maysey claims this move isn’t to ignite an MMA fighters union.

Economists will determine the financial damages sought in the lawsuit, but it is believed to be “substantial.”

The biggest roadblock this class action faces is the fact Bellator MMA exists. It’s tough to argue the UFC is a monopoly when Bellator, the UFC’s biggest rival, is backed by Viacom’s billion-dollar bank account.

(Updated: 12/16/14 at 2:57PM PT):

The UFC issued a brief response following today’s press conference:

“The UFC is aware of the action filed today but has not been served, nor has it had the opportunity to review the document. The UFC will vigorously defend itself and its business practices.”

Don’t forget to follow @5thRound on Twitter, Facebook and Google+!



COMMENTS