| Author |
Message |
snakerattle79
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 69
Reputation: 13.8  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
G-Rush
Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 1786
Location: California
Reputation: 361.2
votes: 4
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 8:14 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Well if you scam Matt Hughes, then you are a friend of mine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iceman
Joined: 30 Aug 2007
Posts: 470
Reputation: 94
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| G-Rush wrote: |
| Well if you scam Matt Hughes, then you are a friend of mine. |
I take it you don't like Hughes too much. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pacman
Joined: 02 Jan 2008
Posts: 11
Location: Seeking vengance in NorCal
Reputation: 2.2
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| good news |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Arm-O
Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 633
Reputation: 126.6
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Why are you all Hughes haters? He has done so much for the sport and will retire as the best WW ever when it's all said and done. Everyone is jocking GSP, but lets see him defend the belt five and two times. He can't even do it once. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tapout1977
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 1493
Location: PA
Reputation: 295.6
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Arm-O wrote: |
| Why are you all Hughes haters? He has done so much for the sport and will retire as the best WW ever when it's all said and done. Everyone is jocking GSP, but lets see him defend the belt five and two times. He can't even do it once. |
In respect to him being a great fighter, in the past, he is currently (and that is the opperative word there) the best WW to step into the Octagon. I think that GSP will in the future be seen as the better of the 2 fighters. I also think much of the hate has to do with the fact that Hughes is a complete ass. Just MO |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MiyagiDoKarate
Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 437
Reputation: 87.4
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| tapout1977 wrote: |
| Arm-O wrote: |
| Why are you all Hughes haters? He has done so much for the sport and will retire as the best WW ever when it's all said and done. Everyone is jocking GSP, but lets see him defend the belt five and two times. He can't even do it once. |
In respect to him being a great fighter, in the past, he is currently (and that is the opperative word there) the best WW to step into the Octagon. I think that GSP will in the future be seen as the better of the 2 fighters. I also think much of the hate has to do with the fact that Hughes is a complete ass. Just MO |
That's assuming that GSP stays at 170, which there is heavy talk that he isn't. That is what is going to make Hughes' run that more impressive. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tapout1977
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 1493
Location: PA
Reputation: 295.6
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| MiyagiDoKarate wrote: |
| tapout1977 wrote: |
| Arm-O wrote: |
| Why are you all Hughes haters? He has done so much for the sport and will retire as the best WW ever when it's all said and done. Everyone is jocking GSP, but lets see him defend the belt five and two times. He can't even do it once. |
In respect to him being a great fighter, in the past, he is currently (and that is the opperative word there) the best WW to step into the Octagon. I think that GSP will in the future be seen as the better of the 2 fighters. I also think much of the hate has to do with the fact that Hughes is a complete ass. Just MO |
That's assuming that GSP stays at 170, which there is heavy talk that he isn't. That is what is going to make Hughes' run that more impressive. |
good point |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
G-Rush
Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 1786
Location: California
Reputation: 361.2
votes: 4
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| But you have to take into consideration that Hughes made his runs during a very different time. The sport has changed so much and gotten so much better, I am not sure he would have had runs like that. He still would have been great, but not to that extent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
