| Author |
Message |
iceman
Joined: 30 Aug 2007
Posts: 470
Reputation: 94  
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 12:02 am Post subject: more deadly striker? |
 |
|
| chuck in his hay day or Anderon Silva now? I think that Anderson is more dangerous because he has now done it at two weight classes. Both put the fear in their oppononts that one shot and it's over. That's for sure. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
slayer6
Joined: 17 Jul 2008
Posts: 47
Reputation: 9.4
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| anderson..he has the bigger variety of strikes. elbows, knees, punches, kicks, chuck just had those heavy hands, although he got lucky on babalu with that brutal head kick. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
G-Rush
Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 1786
Location: California
Reputation: 361.2
votes: 4
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| True. Chuck is just powerful with his fists. More powerful on just one punch, but the better striker is Silva because he can do it in a variety of ways. He is more accurate too |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tim Ngo
Site Admin
Joined: 26 Apr 2007
Posts: 258
Reputation: 51.7
votes: 1
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I'd have to say Anderson Silva. I was a little skeptical about his power but after watching his drop a legitimate light heavyweight and by legitimate I mean a guy who can stand in there and bang. Silva is far more accurate and he has power. Chuck has power, but I don't think he's even close in terms of accuracy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MiyagiDoKarate
Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 437
Reputation: 87.4
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| chuck was the Anderson of yesteryear. He still is a deadly striker, but Anderson is nasty right now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tapout1977
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 1493
Location: PA
Reputation: 295.6
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Anderson without a doubt. Chuck is strong, but Anderson is almost poetic in the way that he executes. His angles are amazing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
G-Rush
Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 1786
Location: California
Reputation: 361.2
votes: 4
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| tapout1977 wrote: |
| Anderson without a doubt. Chuck is strong, but Anderson is almost poetic in the way that he executes. His angles are amazing. |
The thing that I like about Anderson's striking is the accuracy. There is nobody else that is out there that is as efficient as he is. It is crazy, he probably lands like 80% of his strikes.
Also, "poetic?" That sounded gay.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iceman
Joined: 30 Aug 2007
Posts: 470
Reputation: 94
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| G-Rush wrote: |
| tapout1977 wrote: |
| Anderson without a doubt. Chuck is strong, but Anderson is almost poetic in the way that he executes. His angles are amazing. |
The thing that I like about Anderson's striking is the accuracy. There is nobody else that is out there that is as efficient as he is. It is crazy, he probably lands like 80% of his strikes.
Also, "poetic?" That sounded gay. |
He fights like it's an art form. smooth and fluent.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tapout1977
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 1493
Location: PA
Reputation: 295.6
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| G-Rush wrote: |
| tapout1977 wrote: |
| Anderson without a doubt. Chuck is strong, but Anderson is almost poetic in the way that he executes. His angles are amazing. |
The thing that I like about Anderson's striking is the accuracy. There is nobody else that is out there that is as efficient as he is. It is crazy, he probably lands like 80% of his strikes.
Also, "poetic?" That sounded gay. |
No, it would have sounded gay if I would have said "He fights like it's an art form. smooth and fluent. " |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Geezer
Joined: 08 Aug 2007
Posts: 164
Reputation: 32.8
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lol, we all watch guys in tights... that's gay |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ls18
Joined: 19 Aug 2008
Posts: 62
Reputation: 12.4
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Anderson, He's obviously got powerful punches as well as knees, elbows, kicks, basically he's just a nasty striker. One punch power goes to chuck though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Arm-O
Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 633
Reputation: 126.6
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ls18 wrote: |
| Anderson, He's obviously got powerful punches as well as knees, elbows, kicks, basically he's just a nasty striker. One punch power goes to chuck though. |
Chuck has kicks too, he just doesn't use them. He knocked out Babalu with a head kick |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ls18
Joined: 19 Aug 2008
Posts: 62
Reputation: 12.4
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Evans knocked out Salmon with one, doesn't mean he can use them extensively. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
G-Rush
Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 1786
Location: California
Reputation: 361.2
votes: 4
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ls18 wrote: |
| Evans knocked out Salmon with one, doesn't mean he can use them extensively. |
I think that is Rashad's only KO. That was pretty sick at that, but yeah, I don't think that he has KO power in him on a consistant basis. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
